SEO podcast EP 21

How long does SEO take, and what to do while you wait

SEO podcast EP 21. When you want to quit SEO, optimise your life before your site
SEO podcast EP 21 · Aired 24 September 2026 · 27 min · Korean audio · Solo episodeWatch on YouTube

✦The month-three moment

Two or three months into an SEO programme, the thought arrives: should we stop? You changed the keywords, published the blog posts, even redesigned the site, and no enquiries came. Anyone would think it. But when I open those sites, the thing that needs fixing is usually not the site.

More often than not, what needed fixing was not the site at all.

There was no place in your week where this work could live.

This episode is about how to make that place, and why weeks or months are not enough to show a result. It is also about what happens if you stop now: the position you were building goes to the competitor who kept going.

A dashed placeholder site on the left, an arrow, and a weekly calendar on the right with some slots filled in gold. The word optimise sits above both, greyed out over the site and highlighted over the calendar.
The whole episode in one picture. You do not optimise the site first, you first make a place for the work inside the week.

✦The same "no enquiries" hides different stages

When someone tells me there are no enquiries, the first thing I do is work out which stage they are at.

The result is the same, no enquiries, but the situation behind it can be completely different.

One site is being seen: impressions have started, pages appear in search, rankings are climbing, and the enquiries have not arrived yet. Another site has pages that never made it into search at all. The first needs watching and improving. The second does not need patience, it needs the blockage cleared. Same outcome on the report, opposite work to do.

Impressions, visits, trust and enquiry shown as four steps in two rows. In the top row only enquiry is empty, labelled watch and improve. In the bottom row all four are empty, labelled clear the blockage first.
The same no enquiries, two different sites. The top one needs watching and improving, the bottom one needs the blockage cleared.

If you are running this from outside Korea, the split matters even more, because the two problems get diagnosed remotely and the wrong one gets funded.

✦Fifty videos, eighty-five subscribers

Let me start with my own numbers. This podcast channel is still in the trial-and-error stage.

I have already put up about fifty videos, and I am still at eighty-five subscribers.

A number card showing fifty plus videos next to eighty-five subscribers.
My own channel at the time of recording.

Given what one video costs in time, that is disappointing. I am not stopping, because SEO taught me something first.

The effort you put into content and the result it produces do not move at the same speed every time.

Time alone does not fix it either. I change titles, narrow topics, analyse keywords and keep checking which videos got a response. What I will not do is treat the current number as a verdict on whether it can work. Websites behave the same way. Sometimes one well-written page brings an enquiry immediately. More often, related content accumulates, the pages connect to each other, and results arrive in increments. Along the way the numbers that move first are impressions and rankings for specific queries, not the enquiry itself.

✦Not a diet, a change of constitution

I describe SEO less as a crash diet and more as changing your constitution, the whole set of daily habits.

Starve yourself and the weight comes back. Meals, sleep and exercise have to move together before the body changes. A site is the same: a few blog posts do not flip it, several things have to move at once. What matters is what you are changing, and what signal that change produces. Google and your visitors are both watching a site get better over time.

A diet changes meals alone and goes back to before. A change of constitution keeps meals, sleep and exercise going together.
Weight lost by starving comes back. A site fixed in one place goes back to where it was.

That said, "we are in a plateau" cannot be the answer to every problem. If the direction is wrong and all you hear is that these things take time, of course you lose patience.

A flat line that forks after the plateau. The dotted branch rises and is labelled passing through, the solid branch falls and is labelled blocked.
Waiting on its own does not tell you which branch you are on.

Waiting needs a reason behind it.

✦Decide what you are accumulating

Looking at the competitor sitting above you in the results is frustrating. Your service is not worse, so why are they always there? At that point I stop looking at the page on screen and look at what that company has accumulated. How much of what a customer wants to know have they covered? How do their related pages connect? How many other sites introduce that brand?

A company that has been running a site for years is likely to have those assets. That gap does not close in a quarter. It does not mean an older site is unbeatable either. You can start from the topic the competitor never covered properly, or the question customers still cannot find an answer to.

The page you see resting on three layers beneath it: content, internal links and outside mentions.
The gap with an older competitor is these layers, not their age.

What matters is not the fact that they lasted, it is what they accumulated during that time.

Research the format before you write

Once you have a target query, decide what to build for it: a service landing page, a product page, or an informational article.

You do not decide this by instinct or taste, you decide it by research.

Search the query on Google and put the question into AI search yourself, then look at what format the top pages use. If the top results are all comparisons, reviews and guides and you publish a service overview, you will struggle. If the top results are all service pages, an informational article will not take that slot no matter how well written. Format is not the only thing to read either. Look at which questions those pages answer and at what depth, and the shape of what you should build becomes obvious.

A target query above two columns. One column holds guide, review and comparison results, the other holds service pages. An informational article wins under the first, a landing page wins under the second.
For the same query you have to enter in the format already sitting at the top, an article or a landing page.

In the end this is keyword research, page research and competitor research all at once.

Before you decide your site is too young

An older site has an advantage because of the content, links and brand recognition built up over that time, not because of the number itself. Which is why an old site can still have a problem: if an important page is missing from search, or customers cannot find what they came for, there is something to fix. Before concluding that your site is too new, check three things. Does it actually answer what customers are asking? Are your key service or product pages in the index? And once someone lands, can they easily do the next thing?

Press this and my new posts show up more often in your Google results.

✦Before you rebuild the site

When results are slow, the instinct is to rebuild everything. The design is dated, a full relaunch will surely help. I understand it, because a visible change feels like the most certain fix. But push too hard to lose weight quickly and you damage something first.

I have seen search traffic that was working fall away after a full site relaunch.

The design improved, the site got easier and faster, and traffic still dropped. Changing domains or URLs needs particular care: you need a plan for where the old addresses send people and how the content that was earning search traffic survives the move.

Three old URLs mapped to new ones. Two connect, the third ends in a red cross and an empty dashed box marked broken.
A relaunch is a house move. If you do not decide where each old address goes, the traffic it earned disappears.

Relaunching is not the problem. Changing everything at once without checking what was already working is. So before a rebuild I look at which pages bring search traffic, which queries they come in on, and which pages produce enquiries. Change what needs changing, and protect what is already doing its job.

Not losing what you have built matters as much as building something new.

✦I optimised my life before my site

Most SEO programmes start with plenty of enthusiasm. Keywords get organised, several posts go out, and someone decides that this time they will keep it up. Then it stops. There is always something more urgent. In Korea very few companies have a team dedicated to this, so it runs alongside everything else: deadlines promised to clients, projects tied directly to revenue, staff and suppliers who need an answer now. The company's own site slides to the back of the queue.

I am an SEO consultant by trade, and I still got to my own site far too late.

It is not just me. Agencies put their own sites last too, because client work is paid, so the structure that assigns resources to it already exists. Doing the work that pays first is reasonable. That is why I find it hard to tell a founder to simply be disciplined and keep going. I know how hard willpower alone is in a busy week.

Three client tasks with due badges next to three empty dashed boxes for your own site, the last one reading next week.
Work with a deadline gets in first. Agencies push their own sites back too.

Instead of doing SEO when there is time left over, turn it into a fixed amount of work at a fixed time.

A four o'clock pickup made the limit

This connects to something at home. A few months ago my wife went back to work and our baby started daycare, so I had to leave to collect her at four in the afternoon while running the company. I wanted to be a founder who does the business well and a father who is actually present. Staying late because work was unfinished stopped being an option. I had a hard limit.

So I moved meetings and work to finish by four. Getting up between four and five in the morning means going to bed early, so the evening is with my daughter and we are asleep somewhere between nine and ten. It did not work at first. There were days I overslept, days I only just made the pickup. It is not perfect. It has settled enough that I now exercise three to five times a week inside those hours. Over about four months I lost three or four kilos and gained muscle.

A day laid out as work, daughter and sleep, with four in the afternoon marked fixed, waking at four to five in the morning and sleeping at nine to ten at night.
Only the four o clock pickup is fixed. Everything else moved to fit it.

None of that happened at once. It happened by changing the constitution in stages. Rather than telling myself to find more time, I set a limit on the time I have and fitted the work inside it. Running a website is the same. A plan to publish every day matters less than securing one hour a week you will genuinely keep.

What matters is whether you can carry it into next month and the month after.

To do SEO well, optimise your own life and your own work first.

What I had to optimise first was my day, my week and my month.

If you do not make a place for it inside the week, nobody else is going to optimise the site for you.

✦Consistency is not repetition

Keeping at it and repeating the same thing without ever checking are two different things.

Publishing steadily does not help if the topics are ones your customers never search for. Using AI and automation is not the problem either. But if the only thing growing is the publishing count, the site is getting heavier, and nothing has been learned, the process itself needs a look. Check which queries a new post is appearing for, whether the customer you imagined is actually arriving, and which topics got a response, then plan the next piece from that.

Back to my channel: fifty videos and eighty-five subscribers is a disappointing number. I do not read it as fifty failures, because I can see which titles got a response and which topics did not. Collecting data is not the point either. It only means something if it changes the next video.

Visibility and enquiries belong in the same view

Being visible in search and receiving enquiries have to be looked at together.

What you want is not a ranking table. It is the customer who needs your service arriving and turning into an enquiry. For that, several things have to line up: search engines can reach the page, the page answers what customers ask, the visitor can understand and trust the service once they land, and the enquiry itself is easy to send.

Impressions, visits and trust shown as narrowing bars with drop-off marked at each step, ending at enquiry.
There is a place to leak at every step on the way to an enquiry.

Speed belongs here too. When a site slows down, visitors do not wait, they leave. So the site needs its own diet: images sized for the screen they appear on, nothing unnecessarily heavy in the images and video. Text as well. Some pages are so long the important part is buried, and others give neither the search engine nor the visitor enough to go on.

A page mock-up with three problems marked: slow loading, oversized images, and text that is either too much or too little.
What leaks inside the page is usually one of these three.

If search traffic is arriving and enquiries are not, the keywords are not the only suspect. Check whether these are your customers, whether the service explanation is sufficient, whether there is evidence that makes trusting you reasonable, and whether the enquiry button or form is getting in the way.

Before deciding whether to continue or stop, find out what needs changing.

✦A weekly and monthly routine

Once the direction is set you need a way to keep going. If you have four or five hours a week for the site, do not spend all of it publishing. Keep time for checking and fixing. Scale changes the numbers, but this is a reasonable first split.

A review cadence table: one hour weekly on rankings and indexing, one hour monthly on drop-off points, every two to four weeks on technical issues and links, competitors and AI visibility always on, alerts and rank tracking automated while you make the decisions.
One hour a week and one hour a month is enough to start. Let tools handle the alerts and rank tracking, and keep the judgement yourself.

One hour a week on keywords

Watch how the target keywords move, and whether each keyword is attaching to the page you intended. Check that new pages are being indexed. Look at related queries and the questions people actually ask, whether your content answers them properly, and which unanswered question is worth covering next.

One hour a month on what is stuck

If a page gets impressions and visits but no conversion, find where people drop out. Is the service explanation thin, is there evidence they can trust, is the enquiry form actually working? Check whether your own pages are competing for the same keyword and eating each other's visibility. That happens more often than people expect.

Fortnightly or monthly on technical and links

Look for technical issues and what would be worth improving. Check the links that should be arriving, the internal links that should exist and do not, and anything broken by a URL change or a deleted page. Check the opposite too: spam links pointing at you from sites you would not choose. With extra time, look for ways to be mentioned and linked from outside.

Analytics, AI search and the competition

Look beyond the keywords you chose to the prompts you care about, and check how your brand appears when someone asks AI about your category. This is the part I find most interesting at the moment. Keep an eye on competitor sites as well: what the ones doing better are trying, and what strategy would take you past them.

How long a review takes depends on the size of the site. Rather than doing everything perfectly from the start, pick the items that matter on your site. Automate the repetitive checks such as alerts and rank tracking, and keep the judgement for yourself.

Spend your time deciding what to do when something changes.

And at every review, ask one question: is this page built only to be visible to a search engine, or does it actually help a customer choose us?

Being visible in search is the starting line.

After that, there has to be something that understands and persuades the customer.

✦Three lines

  1. Do not judge the whole programme on the absence of enquiries. To find the cause you have to look at the process as well.
  2. Separate out where you are stuck. A page missing from search, a page that is visible but gets no visits, and a page that gets visits but no enquiry are three different problems.
  3. Optimise your life before your site. Build a way of working that survives the week you actually have.

Optimise your life before your site.

Slow results are not comfortable. Still, do not tear everything down because you are anxious, and do not keep the old approach only because it would be a waste to drop it. This is not something you finish in a few months. It is about where your brand sits in Google and AI search six months, a year and three years from now. If you are entering Korea, the timeline question is answered in the Korean SEO FAQ.

Which stage are you stuck at?

Send me your site and target market, and I'll tell you whether I can help.

Tell me where you are stuck

Sources

  • Insung Song's SEO podcast, episode 21, "When you want to quit SEO, optimise your life before your site". Watch on YouTube
  • Google Search Central, "In-depth guide to how Google Search works". Read the guide
  • Google Search Central, "SEO Starter Guide". Read the guide

Quotations are translated from the episode 21 script, using a reviewed transcript matched to the published video rather than automatic captions.

✦Common questions

Longer than the few weeks or months most programmes are judged on. In episode 21 the point is that no enquiries after two or three months is not a verdict on the whole programme, because impressions and rankings for specific queries usually move before the enquiry does. That is not a licence to call everything a plateau, though. Check that the direction is right first, then give it time.

Before deciding whether to continue or stop, work out which stage you are stuck at. A site that is getting impressions and climbing rankings without enquiries and a site whose pages never entered the index look identical on the report and need opposite work. The first needs watching and improving. The second needs the blockage cleared, not more patience.

Not without checking first. Episode 21 describes search traffic that was working falling away after a full relaunch, even though the design, usability and speed all improved. Before a rebuild, find out which pages bring search traffic, which queries they arrive on and which pages produce enquiries. If you are changing domains or URLs, you need a plan for where the old addresses send people and how the content earning that traffic survives the move.

An older site has an advantage because of the content, links and brand recognition accumulated over that time, not because of its age as a number. That cuts both ways: an old site with important pages missing from the index still has a problem, and a new site can start from the topic a competitor never covered properly or the question customers still cannot find an answer to.

Change the process rather than relying on discipline. Decide who owns it, when the time is taken and how much gets done in one sitting, so it becomes a fixed amount of work at a fixed time instead of something you do when time is left over. One hour a week you will genuinely keep beats a publishing schedule you abandon in a month.

Episode 21 suggests one hour a week on keywords, one hour a month on what is stuck, and a fortnightly or monthly pass on technical issues and links. The keyword hour covers ranking movement, whether pages are indexed and which questions to answer next. The monthly hour finds pages that get visits but no conversion and checks whether your own pages are competing for the same keyword. Adjust the split to the size of the site.

Consistency is not the same as repeating the same thing without checking. Before adding more output, look at the work already done: whether your pages are in the index, which queries they appear for, and what similar competitor pages cover that yours does not. If search traffic arrives but enquiries do not, look past the keywords at the service explanation, the evidence that makes you trustworthy and the enquiry form itself.

Share this post
Insung Song, SEO & AI Search Consultant
Written by
Insung Song
SEO & AI Search Consultant, founder of Hosoo Media

I help companies grow in search, mostly on Google, in Korea and across borders. Since 2021, the field has taught me to look at content and structure together rather than chasing one technical fix.

Get in touch

Tell me where you are stuck

Insung Song, SEO & AI Search Consultant based in Seoul
You do not have to figure out Korea on your own.

If you are planning to launch in Korea, or you are already there and search is not working, send me a note. Tell me about the company and where things stand. I'll look at it myself and tell you whether I can help, and where I would start.

I read every message myself. If I am not the right fit, I will say so and point you somewhere better.

Consent

Prefer email? admin@hosoomedia.com · Based in Seoul (UTC+9) · I reply in English or Korean.

Newsletter

Not ready to talk yet?

I send notes on what is actually happening in Korean search. What changed at Naver, what worked, what did not. Written for people who have to decide about this market.

Consent

Press this and my new posts show up more often in your Google results.